Since Valentine’s day is just a scant 25 days away and because Clyde is a genuine All-American romantic kind of guy, I thought now would be as good of a time as any to take someone near and dear to my heart to a romantic movie or two, then come back here to the old blogoroonie and give everyone a full report. That someone whom I escorted of course would be my girlfriend, Maud Findlay, who was overjoyed that I cared and loved her so deeply that I would give up a full day out of my three day weekend to escort her to 27 Dresses instead of wandering off alone to see Cloverfield. Okay, so maybe it didn’t exactly happen that way and maybe it was she who had to drag me off to see it, but there are worst ways to spend a Saturday such as having a tooth pulled or cleaning out garbage cans.
All kidding aside, for a guy to admit he might really enjoy a chick flick is tantamount to being a traitor to your brethren, especially when there’s a giant monster of some sort eating the head off of the Statue of Liberty in the movie auditorium right across the hall. So I won’t admit to that. Instead I’ll just say that as romantic films that get the female juices flowing, 27 Dresses wasn’t half bad.
It certainly wasn’t what I expected though. When I first saw the preview a couple of weeks ago, I thought it might be a rollicking romantic screwball comedy. It turned out to be only about 10 per cent screwballish and 90 percent sweet, sad, and touching. In other words, it’s a combination that is guaranteed to make any woman’s heart go all aflutter.
Like any so many other of the several thousand romantic comedies that have come before it, 27 Dresses has the usual plot gimmick to help get us from Point A to Point B. And if all goes well, our hero and heroine will somehow overcome all obstacles to find true love by the time the credits roll or hopefully before I have to make a quick dash to the nearest restroom after downing a $150 dollar supersized large diet Coke.
Katharine Heigl plays Jane, a woman who just loves going to weddings, being a bridesmaid for her friends and in most cases being the go to person when it comes to making wedding arrangements. We find out quickly that Jane’s fascination and knack for helping with weddings came about soon after her mother died when as a very young child she helped her sister find a bathroom, fix her hair, and used a bow in her sister’s hair to repair the bride’s wedding dress. When we catch up with Jane as an adult, it turns out that she is a bridesmaid at two different weddings on the same night, requiring her to hire a taxi for the evening and to shuttle back and forth between the two receptions changing in and out of the different bridesmaid dresses while riding in the back seat. Okay, it’s a rather funny and entertaining sequence if not quite believable but at least the film seemed to be making good use of its premise.
Enter Kevin (James Marsden). Kevin is a newspaper reporter whose present job consists of
going to weddings and then writing about them. It’s a job he loathes, but we all have to make a living somehow don’t we? Frankly though, if my job consisted of being required to attend upscale weddings during the day, and then writing about it at night, then I wouldn’t be bitching and moaning and groaning about it. I’d figure that life is damn good. We find out later that Kevin got dumped at the altar once when his bride-to-be ran away with his best friend so I suppose one could understand why it might make him more than a little grumpy. Wouldn’t bother me though so maybe it’s a line of work I should look into. Anyway, I digress. Where was I? Oh yeah, Kevin and Jane.
Before the night is over Jane is forced to share her Taxi with Kevin, whom she quickly decides she doesn't like. After Jane departs for the evening, Kevin discovers her daily planner and finds out that Jane has pretty much made a lifetime career of being a bridesmaid. Twenty-seven times to be exact. Thus, you now have a clue as to what the deep dark and mysterious meaning of the title is. Kevin convinces his editor to let him write a story about Jane which if successful, will get him a promotion and out of the Wedding of the Week Club.
Meanwhile on the home front, we soon discover that t
he reason Jane herself may never have gotten married is because she is carrying the torch for her boss George (Edward Burns). And no, it’s not a case of George not knowing that Jane exists. In fact, as far as George is concerned, Jane is indispensable. It’s just that he doesn’t see her as a love interest but does acknowledge that she is one of the best necktie tiers in the country. Jane hopes all of that will change someday, despite the fact that her co-worker and friend Casey (Judy Greer) is constantly nagging her to move on with her life.
And as if all of that weren’t complicated enough, Jane’s beautiful sister Tess (Malin Akerman) promptly flies into town, meets Boss George, and quicker than you can say Dress Number 28, they begin dating and falling in love much to the chagrin of Jane. This of course leaves Jane and Kevin to somehow begin dating even though she despises his cynical attitude towards marriage.
So will George and Tess get married? Or will George realize that Jane is the girl for him? Will Kevin be the one to actually fall for Tess? Or does he only have eyes for Jane? Will Kevin write the story about Jane’s 27 appearances as a bridesmaid? And will it be published about the time his cynicism might be turning to love? Will George discover that Tess isn’t all she is cracked up to be and turn to Jane for comfort? Will Jane finally tire of being a bridesmaid and wedding planner all rolled into one? And will Izzy and George get back together again and have wild drunken sex once more? Oh sorry, but I am missing Grey’s.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that you’ll be able to answer all of those above questions by the time 27 Dresses has completed about a fourth of it’s 107 minutes of running time. But chances are it won’t matter to you as most of the films in the romance genre usually are at least somewhat predictable. You’ll still find plenty to enjoy thanks to another strong performance by Katharine Heigl. It’s one thing to star in a film of this sort and to get a few laughs with some well written snappy dialogue, but Heigl manages to go beyond that. She has this wonderful ability to draw the audience into her character. You can readily identify with her, laugh with her, cry for her, be embarrassed for her, and to feel as sad and lonely as she seems to be in the early part of this movie. We cheer her when she finally does take a stance, but we feel her remorse for having done so when it backfires to some extent. There are only a handful of actresses who can manage all of that, and do it all in one film. Sadly, at the rate her film career is taking off, I may eventually have to deal with the fact that Grey’s will be losing another one of its original and best cast members sometime soon.
The supporting cast in this film aren’t exactly slouches either. Malin Akerman does a great job of making Tess the evil obnoxious sister that you’ll love to hate. James Marsden manages to somehow make his character believable as someone who is suppose to be a jerk on the outside, but yet gives indications that there is more to him than meets the eye. But best of the supporting players is Judy Greer as Jane’s best friend Casey. She has at least three of the films funniest moments including doing her best to literally knock some sense into Jane at one point.
The bottom line is that most romantic comedies are predictable. They are only successful when they have a good gimmick to make things interesting and when the script has enough witty moments to make you laugh occasionally. But most importantly, the script and the actors have to make you care about them and their romantic dilemma, and to feel the same ranges of emotions that they are feeling on the screen. And thanks in large part to another fine effort by Katharine Heigl, 27 dresses certainly manages to do that. And when a film can achieve such lofty goals I have no choice but to give it my grade, which for 27 Dresses would be a B.
And for those of who who have been searching for the release date of 27 Dresses on DVD that would be April 29, 2008.
All kidding aside, for a guy to admit he might really enjoy a chick flick is tantamount to being a traitor to your brethren, especially when there’s a giant monster of some sort eating the head off of the Statue of Liberty in the movie auditorium right across the hall. So I won’t admit to that. Instead I’ll just say that as romantic films that get the female juices flowing, 27 Dresses wasn’t half bad.It certainly wasn’t what I expected though. When I first saw the preview a couple of weeks ago, I thought it might be a rollicking romantic screwball comedy. It turned out to be only about 10 per cent screwballish and 90 percent sweet, sad, and touching. In other words, it’s a combination that is guaranteed to make any woman’s heart go all aflutter.
Like any so many other of the several thousand romantic comedies that have come before it, 27 Dresses has the usual plot gimmick to help get us from Point A to Point B. And if all goes well, our hero and heroine will somehow overcome all obstacles to find true love by the time the credits roll or hopefully before I have to make a quick dash to the nearest restroom after downing a $150 dollar supersized large diet Coke.
Katharine Heigl plays Jane, a woman who just loves going to weddings, being a bridesmaid for her friends and in most cases being the go to person when it comes to making wedding arrangements. We find out quickly that Jane’s fascination and knack for helping with weddings came about soon after her mother died when as a very young child she helped her sister find a bathroom, fix her hair, and used a bow in her sister’s hair to repair the bride’s wedding dress. When we catch up with Jane as an adult, it turns out that she is a bridesmaid at two different weddings on the same night, requiring her to hire a taxi for the evening and to shuttle back and forth between the two receptions changing in and out of the different bridesmaid dresses while riding in the back seat. Okay, it’s a rather funny and entertaining sequence if not quite believable but at least the film seemed to be making good use of its premise.Enter Kevin (James Marsden). Kevin is a newspaper reporter whose present job consists of
going to weddings and then writing about them. It’s a job he loathes, but we all have to make a living somehow don’t we? Frankly though, if my job consisted of being required to attend upscale weddings during the day, and then writing about it at night, then I wouldn’t be bitching and moaning and groaning about it. I’d figure that life is damn good. We find out later that Kevin got dumped at the altar once when his bride-to-be ran away with his best friend so I suppose one could understand why it might make him more than a little grumpy. Wouldn’t bother me though so maybe it’s a line of work I should look into. Anyway, I digress. Where was I? Oh yeah, Kevin and Jane.Before the night is over Jane is forced to share her Taxi with Kevin, whom she quickly decides she doesn't like. After Jane departs for the evening, Kevin discovers her daily planner and finds out that Jane has pretty much made a lifetime career of being a bridesmaid. Twenty-seven times to be exact. Thus, you now have a clue as to what the deep dark and mysterious meaning of the title is. Kevin convinces his editor to let him write a story about Jane which if successful, will get him a promotion and out of the Wedding of the Week Club.
Meanwhile on the home front, we soon discover that t
he reason Jane herself may never have gotten married is because she is carrying the torch for her boss George (Edward Burns). And no, it’s not a case of George not knowing that Jane exists. In fact, as far as George is concerned, Jane is indispensable. It’s just that he doesn’t see her as a love interest but does acknowledge that she is one of the best necktie tiers in the country. Jane hopes all of that will change someday, despite the fact that her co-worker and friend Casey (Judy Greer) is constantly nagging her to move on with her life.And as if all of that weren’t complicated enough, Jane’s beautiful sister Tess (Malin Akerman) promptly flies into town, meets Boss George, and quicker than you can say Dress Number 28, they begin dating and falling in love much to the chagrin of Jane. This of course leaves Jane and Kevin to somehow begin dating even though she despises his cynical attitude towards marriage.
So will George and Tess get married? Or will George realize that Jane is the girl for him? Will Kevin be the one to actually fall for Tess? Or does he only have eyes for Jane? Will Kevin write the story about Jane’s 27 appearances as a bridesmaid? And will it be published about the time his cynicism might be turning to love? Will George discover that Tess isn’t all she is cracked up to be and turn to Jane for comfort? Will Jane finally tire of being a bridesmaid and wedding planner all rolled into one? And will Izzy and George get back together again and have wild drunken sex once more? Oh sorry, but I am missing Grey’s.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that you’ll be able to answer all of those above questions by the time 27 Dresses has completed about a fourth of it’s 107 minutes of running time. But chances are it won’t matter to you as most of the films in the romance genre usually are at least somewhat predictable. You’ll still find plenty to enjoy thanks to another strong performance by Katharine Heigl. It’s one thing to star in a film of this sort and to get a few laughs with some well written snappy dialogue, but Heigl manages to go beyond that. She has this wonderful ability to draw the audience into her character. You can readily identify with her, laugh with her, cry for her, be embarrassed for her, and to feel as sad and lonely as she seems to be in the early part of this movie. We cheer her when she finally does take a stance, but we feel her remorse for having done so when it backfires to some extent. There are only a handful of actresses who can manage all of that, and do it all in one film. Sadly, at the rate her film career is taking off, I may eventually have to deal with the fact that Grey’s will be losing another one of its original and best cast members sometime soon.
The supporting cast in this film aren’t exactly slouches either. Malin Akerman does a great job of making Tess the evil obnoxious sister that you’ll love to hate. James Marsden manages to somehow make his character believable as someone who is suppose to be a jerk on the outside, but yet gives indications that there is more to him than meets the eye. But best of the supporting players is Judy Greer as Jane’s best friend Casey. She has at least three of the films funniest moments including doing her best to literally knock some sense into Jane at one point.
The bottom line is that most romantic comedies are predictable. They are only successful when they have a good gimmick to make things interesting and when the script has enough witty moments to make you laugh occasionally. But most importantly, the script and the actors have to make you care about them and their romantic dilemma, and to feel the same ranges of emotions that they are feeling on the screen. And thanks in large part to another fine effort by Katharine Heigl, 27 dresses certainly manages to do that. And when a film can achieve such lofty goals I have no choice but to give it my grade, which for 27 Dresses would be a B.
And for those of who who have been searching for the release date of 27 Dresses on DVD that would be April 29, 2008.



2 comments:
Glad you didn't stab your own eyes out while watching this one (I'm notorious for detesting Rom-Coms) but I still think you shoulda snuck into the auditorium next door to see Cloverfield, because really that's one you don't want to miss on the big screen, while this will probably be the same on any good ole 13" B&W.
13 inch black and white? Do they even exist anymore?
Yeah, I'd of snuck out into the other theater and my girfriend would be telling me to sneak out to the highway and walk home...lol. But I will be watching Cloverfield on a 57 inch screen which is big enough but not so big that I might get motion sickness.
That is when it comes out on DVD. I have to say that Netflix is getting extremely slow with some of their new releases. It's beginning to bug me and to put them on hold for a while and use blockbuster until I catch up.
Post a Comment